I came across half a thought today that disturbed me. I did not feel like being disturbed, so I ignored it. But it was persistent. I kept getting this image of Amarosa, the woman who has become the "villain" of reality TV by acting like a total and complete bitch. She first gained notoriety by acting unscrupulously towards her teammates in Donald Trump's The Apprentice . She lied, refused to participate in the team's efforts, and behaved overall appalingly. After she was kicked out, she appeared on a series of TV shows alongside movie stars and celebrities. Then, she participated in the Celeb Reality Show, which concluded a few night ago. Again, she was rude, mean, and an overall bitch. After calling one of her housemates a crackwhore and a bad mother, she gloated that she had forced her nemesis out of the house. Then she left the show, smiling, saying that she regretted nothing and said that a whole new category of actors had been created because of her -- the reality villain. This idea -- and the fact that she was absolutely right - disturbed me immensly. She winked at the end, as if to plant a seed of doubt in our mind - that maybe she was just acting like a bitch the whole time and wasn't one in real life.
Of course reality shows are anything but real. Of course producers like having a shock factor in their shows. Of course we like to sit in our comfortable chairs and get the feeling that we are at least better than one person in this world. But that she is actively sanctioned and her actions condoned by not getting booed off stage when she comes on the show to talk about her life -- that bothers me. It bothers me that she should have left the Trump show with her tail between her legs and never gotten a real job after that and instead she became rich and famous. It bothers me because it sends the wrong message. It sends the message that immoral people-- people for whom the ends justify the means-- when put in the right setting, get to be someone in this world. She lied, she cheated, she broke all rules of common courtesy and respect. How does she get invited to gala dinners and red carpet events? How does she dare to stand next to people of talent, honor and integrity? She lives as a parasite, feeding off of our culture's desire for scandal and moral degradation.
Tuesday, November 29, 2005
Monday, November 28, 2005
Reason for a drumroll...
I would like to take this opportunity to create an environment of excitement. Drum roll, please. I have been...
rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, still rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, still rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, still rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, still rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, still rolling)
...AWARDED A GRADUATE ASSISTANTSHIP!
This means I can afford to go to graduate school in the spring.
It also means I will stay in Charleston for two more years.
It also means I am super excited about life right now.
rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, still rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, still rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, still rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, still rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, rolling, still rolling)
...AWARDED A GRADUATE ASSISTANTSHIP!
This means I can afford to go to graduate school in the spring.
It also means I will stay in Charleston for two more years.
It also means I am super excited about life right now.
Wednesday, November 23, 2005
The Thanksgiving Plan or How to Land a Great Meal as a Foreigner
Every year around this time, I thank the gods that I don't have family in the United States. About a month before the big day (of Thanksgiving, that is) I start setting up my plan that inevitably lands me with a great meal. This is how my "get-invited-to-the-best-thanksgiving-mean" plan works:
I set my strategy up by ask the unsuspecting friend or renowned good cook what their Thanksgiving plans are. They respond and, if the answer sounds appealing, I proceed to phase two: setting myself up for the reciprocal question. I do this by leaving a lot of silence and looking slightly embarrassed. When they ask me what I am doing, I go in for the kill. I change my countenance to look like I am slightly sad but trying to look strong. My words usually go something like this: "Me? Oh, I don't have any family in America. The closest person geographically to me is my brother, and he lives in the western extremity of Canada. So I don't know what I'm going to do. Probably nothing. I'll just stay at home by myself and try to enjoy the quiet, I guess." And that usually does it. I am always invited to Thanksgiving dinner. Any American who hears the words "alone" and "Thanksgiving" automatically feels a tweak of compassion and sadness. And since I am also cute and not from here, I make a good conversation piece. After I have raked in a few invitations, I consider my options and try to find the best cooking/family atmosphere combo. Then I make my calculated selection and wait for the big day to arrive when I can shower my host family with compliments on their fabulous American cooking and assure them that theirs was the best Thanksgiving meal I have ever had. Brilliant.
I set my strategy up by ask the unsuspecting friend or renowned good cook what their Thanksgiving plans are. They respond and, if the answer sounds appealing, I proceed to phase two: setting myself up for the reciprocal question. I do this by leaving a lot of silence and looking slightly embarrassed. When they ask me what I am doing, I go in for the kill. I change my countenance to look like I am slightly sad but trying to look strong. My words usually go something like this: "Me? Oh, I don't have any family in America. The closest person geographically to me is my brother, and he lives in the western extremity of Canada. So I don't know what I'm going to do. Probably nothing. I'll just stay at home by myself and try to enjoy the quiet, I guess." And that usually does it. I am always invited to Thanksgiving dinner. Any American who hears the words "alone" and "Thanksgiving" automatically feels a tweak of compassion and sadness. And since I am also cute and not from here, I make a good conversation piece. After I have raked in a few invitations, I consider my options and try to find the best cooking/family atmosphere combo. Then I make my calculated selection and wait for the big day to arrive when I can shower my host family with compliments on their fabulous American cooking and assure them that theirs was the best Thanksgiving meal I have ever had. Brilliant.
Monday, November 21, 2005
November 21, 2005
Nothing much to report. Life is good. I'm excited about turkey day and my friend Siobhan's mother's fantastic cooking. This weekend we had a keg party at the house. We played lots of games and drank lots of cheap beer... fun times. I also put in a bunch of hours doing research for a writer who is finishing a book on the 1886 Charleston Earthquake. My young eyes went through lots and lots of old newspaper articles...
Everything else about this weekend is either incriminating or boring. Mostly incriminating. So I will refrain from mentioning it.
Everything else about this weekend is either incriminating or boring. Mostly incriminating. So I will refrain from mentioning it.
Friday, November 18, 2005
When You Are Old
William Butler Yeats (1865–1939)
When you are old and gray and full of sleep,
And nodding by the fire, take down this book,
And slowly read, and dream of the soft look
Your eyes had once, and of their shadows deep;
How many loved your moments of glad grace,
And loved your beauty with love false or true,
But one man loved the pilgrim soul in you,
And loved the sorrows of your changing face;
And bending down beside the glowing bars,
Murmur, a little sadly, how Love fled
And paced upon the mountains overhead
And hid his face amid a crowd of stars.
So I like this poem for one, because it's got such cool imagery. For two, because it's the neatest thing to think of the person Yeats was writing this for opening a book and seeing a poem about her... regardless of what happened in the end. And for three, because of the sentence in bold -- the pilgrim soul. What woman can't identify with that?
But I Am Le Tired
So I am exhausted after staying up til 3:30 to see Harry Potter. But it was so worth it. Oh yeah.
So this French lady came into work today and I gave her a tour in French of the building and we ended up talking about everything and nothing... she was really interesting but I am so tired I can barely speak English and so my words were coming out all garbled and messed up and I just made up words when I couldn't think in French, it's been so long... And anyway... she left to go back to Bordeaux and all I can think of right now is:
"Fire ze missiles!"
"But I am le tired."
"Well, take a nap. And zen... fire ze missiles!."
On that note -- guess who can't wait to take a nap?
So this French lady came into work today and I gave her a tour in French of the building and we ended up talking about everything and nothing... she was really interesting but I am so tired I can barely speak English and so my words were coming out all garbled and messed up and I just made up words when I couldn't think in French, it's been so long... And anyway... she left to go back to Bordeaux and all I can think of right now is:
"Fire ze missiles!"
"But I am le tired."
"Well, take a nap. And zen... fire ze missiles!."
On that note -- guess who can't wait to take a nap?
Thursday, November 17, 2005
There's something about Harry
HARRY POTTER IS COMING OUT TONIGHT!!!!
I'M TRYING TO CONVINCE ANNA TO GO TO A MIDNIGHT SHOWING WITH ME... YOU KNOW, BE MY HOT DATE AND ALL.
But don't you have work in the morning?, you ask
I do, I answer.
But it's HARRY POTTER!!!
I'M TRYING TO CONVINCE ANNA TO GO TO A MIDNIGHT SHOWING WITH ME... YOU KNOW, BE MY HOT DATE AND ALL.
But don't you have work in the morning?, you ask
I do, I answer.
But it's HARRY POTTER!!!
Growing up in Ethiopia...
I was asked several questions about a recent post. The main question was:
I was raised in a family where I had wants but not needs. We were pretty well-off but my mother didn’t spoil us – she could have given us a lot more than she did in terms of material possessions, but she made a point to make sure that we didn’t get everything we wanted all the time. She was a firm believer in getting what you paid for. She would go to a flea market and refuse to buy a napkin if she thought she was being ripped off, and then buy a whole set for a far more expensive price because the quality of the item matched the price. I never had an allowance – if I needed money I’d ask for it and get it – but I wouldn’t get as much as I’d asked for all the time, and sometimes I wouldn’t get any at all. Which is, I suppose, no different than many other children in other parts of the world. So I wouldn’t get everything I wanted but I never was in need of anything.
The fact that I never needed anything and that I lived in a country where I was surrounded by people in need helped me develop a self-consciousness which allowed me to develop what I you call “thoughtfulness.” Growing up in Ethiopia, I was painfully aware that inequality existed in the world – it’s not something someone had to tell me or that I had to read in a book. Every time I walked outside my door, I would be followed by three to five children begging for money. It was a normal part of my life and I didn’t feel guilty about not giving them some, as many tourists who come to Ethiopia do, because I understood that that was life and because it was normal to me. But at times, it would hit me, and I couldn’t ignore it.
One time my favorite beggar (yes, you start having favorites) -- a young man who had dreadlocks, no legs, and the biggest smile in the world and who would stand outside the bakery… wasn’t there anymore. Every day I would go to the bakery and see him… and whether I gave him anything or not, he would always grin at me, and I would grin at him. It was an intimate moment… the recognition of one human being to another… and it would always leave me with a smile on my face. Well, this one time, he wasn’t there. A few weeks later he showed up again, but he didn’t smile at me. I felt crushed. Not because he didn’t smile at me – but because I knew that he wasn’t smiling at all anymore. His eyes were overcome with a veil of sadness and it was like he had given up hope. He kept looking more destitute by the day and wouldn’t accept money if I gave it to him. He just waved me away. The guy who had always managed to smile, even though he had no legs, no job, no money, and lived on the street, wasn’t smiling anymore. Somehow his spirit had been crushed.
I remember going home and crying that first day that he didn’t smile. It was like a world had collapsed. I felt angry and helpless and overcome with emotion. And then I decided that I wasn’t going to eat any more. I don’t know why I did it, really… it’s not like I went out there and gave him my food. But I didn’t eat. For days my mother tried to get me to eat and I wouldn’t… and my brothers laughed at me and said, in their practical voices: “what good is your not eating going to do to him?” But I wasn’t listening to reason. Eventually I fainted. And my mom made me start eating again. It was bizarre and I can’t explain it. I guess I just wanted to feel what he felt, to understand what could make one die inside. Of course I failed.
I guess I realize by growing up in a country as poor as Ethiopia how goddamn lucky I am to get to have the things I have. A blanket, a toy, a car… these are all luxuries. You just don’t know it in America most of the times. Do you know what they use for toys in Ethiopia? The children get scraps off the floor and fill them into a sock and make that into a ball. Their court is the street. They get broken bicycle rims and take a long stick and try to get the rim to roll upright on the ground as long as possible without falling over. I guess I never had the coolest toys or the latest anything… but I always had a real ball. And whenever my mom was driving and a kid happened to lose control of the ball, she would make sure to swerve out of the way so as not to destroy it because, she would say, “how would you like it if I ran over your toy?”
So I guess that set of experiences has impacted the value I ascribe to material possessions and what I subsequently “own” in terms of character, personality, etc.
How has having material goods impacted what you "own" in terms of your attitude, personality, thoughtfulness, etc?
I was raised in a family where I had wants but not needs. We were pretty well-off but my mother didn’t spoil us – she could have given us a lot more than she did in terms of material possessions, but she made a point to make sure that we didn’t get everything we wanted all the time. She was a firm believer in getting what you paid for. She would go to a flea market and refuse to buy a napkin if she thought she was being ripped off, and then buy a whole set for a far more expensive price because the quality of the item matched the price. I never had an allowance – if I needed money I’d ask for it and get it – but I wouldn’t get as much as I’d asked for all the time, and sometimes I wouldn’t get any at all. Which is, I suppose, no different than many other children in other parts of the world. So I wouldn’t get everything I wanted but I never was in need of anything.
The fact that I never needed anything and that I lived in a country where I was surrounded by people in need helped me develop a self-consciousness which allowed me to develop what I you call “thoughtfulness.” Growing up in Ethiopia, I was painfully aware that inequality existed in the world – it’s not something someone had to tell me or that I had to read in a book. Every time I walked outside my door, I would be followed by three to five children begging for money. It was a normal part of my life and I didn’t feel guilty about not giving them some, as many tourists who come to Ethiopia do, because I understood that that was life and because it was normal to me. But at times, it would hit me, and I couldn’t ignore it.
One time my favorite beggar (yes, you start having favorites) -- a young man who had dreadlocks, no legs, and the biggest smile in the world and who would stand outside the bakery… wasn’t there anymore. Every day I would go to the bakery and see him… and whether I gave him anything or not, he would always grin at me, and I would grin at him. It was an intimate moment… the recognition of one human being to another… and it would always leave me with a smile on my face. Well, this one time, he wasn’t there. A few weeks later he showed up again, but he didn’t smile at me. I felt crushed. Not because he didn’t smile at me – but because I knew that he wasn’t smiling at all anymore. His eyes were overcome with a veil of sadness and it was like he had given up hope. He kept looking more destitute by the day and wouldn’t accept money if I gave it to him. He just waved me away. The guy who had always managed to smile, even though he had no legs, no job, no money, and lived on the street, wasn’t smiling anymore. Somehow his spirit had been crushed.
I remember going home and crying that first day that he didn’t smile. It was like a world had collapsed. I felt angry and helpless and overcome with emotion. And then I decided that I wasn’t going to eat any more. I don’t know why I did it, really… it’s not like I went out there and gave him my food. But I didn’t eat. For days my mother tried to get me to eat and I wouldn’t… and my brothers laughed at me and said, in their practical voices: “what good is your not eating going to do to him?” But I wasn’t listening to reason. Eventually I fainted. And my mom made me start eating again. It was bizarre and I can’t explain it. I guess I just wanted to feel what he felt, to understand what could make one die inside. Of course I failed.
I guess I realize by growing up in a country as poor as Ethiopia how goddamn lucky I am to get to have the things I have. A blanket, a toy, a car… these are all luxuries. You just don’t know it in America most of the times. Do you know what they use for toys in Ethiopia? The children get scraps off the floor and fill them into a sock and make that into a ball. Their court is the street. They get broken bicycle rims and take a long stick and try to get the rim to roll upright on the ground as long as possible without falling over. I guess I never had the coolest toys or the latest anything… but I always had a real ball. And whenever my mom was driving and a kid happened to lose control of the ball, she would make sure to swerve out of the way so as not to destroy it because, she would say, “how would you like it if I ran over your toy?”
So I guess that set of experiences has impacted the value I ascribe to material possessions and what I subsequently “own” in terms of character, personality, etc.
Wednesday, November 16, 2005
Why Europeans Don't Approve of the War in Iraq
If you are interested in a different perspective on the war in Iraq, and want to see video footage that I have never seen broadcasted in the United States, check out this site. Be warned, there is graphic footage.
http://www.rainews24.rai.it/ran24/inchiesta/video.asp
http://www.rainews24.rai.it/ran24/inchiesta/video.asp
Sense of Self... and how I am now a proud car owner...
So for the first time in my life I am a proud car owner. I just finished purchasing a Subaru Legacy. My name is on the title, registration, insurance, and license plate (which is in my glove compartment waiting to be attached). I don't think I've ever felt so proud to own anything. This little shoddy used car gives me such a sense of freedom. I can pick up and go anywhere, and if anything happens to it, I am responsible for it. It's liberating and it makes me proud to know that I worked for it and saved for it and that it is deservedly mine.
So this got me thinking. What does the word mine really mean? Is it just a word that expresses the ownership of property? When I think of things that are uniquely mine, I can easily sum it up in material things. I own some clothes, some furniture, some accessories, a passport, a diploma, and now a car. And all of these things, because they are my property, define who I am. But those are not the only things that are mine -- there is a far vaster non-material realm which describes what is mine .
How I look, think, feel, smell, portray myself to others and act are all essential parts to defining me. My culture, my history, my education, and my experiences are uniquely my own as well. So this is the question: how to mine and me fit together? Mine is that which belongs to me. Granted. But mine is also that which defines me. More importantly, mine is that which defines my perception of myself -- both the material and non-material aspects.
How different would I be if I didn't own the clothes, furniture, accessories, passport, diploma, and car that I do? Who would I be if I thought, felt, smelled, portrayed myself, and acted differently? What would be left of me if I was stripped of my culture, my history, my education, and my experiences? Obviously these are rhetorical questions, as I do not believe it is entirely possible to do. But it does make me want to put my life in perspective and think about what would need to be taken away from me, or be different, in order for me not to feel like myself anymore.
I have been without material possessions. My house burned down when I lived in South Africa and I was left with nothing but the clothes I had on. But I didn't feel less than myself for it. In fact, I can recall few instances where I felt more alive.
I have experienced changes in attitudes, beliefs, and physical characteristics. My butt didn't always use to be this big, and I don't still want to join GreenPeace.
I have experienced a significant loss of my original culture and a syncretism with North American culture, I suppose, since moving here four years ago. And my education and my experiences have been significantly increasing since the day I was born.
So it's a hard question to answer.
But what better way to spend ones time than to attempt to express ones sense of self rationally?
So this got me thinking. What does the word mine really mean? Is it just a word that expresses the ownership of property? When I think of things that are uniquely mine, I can easily sum it up in material things. I own some clothes, some furniture, some accessories, a passport, a diploma, and now a car. And all of these things, because they are my property, define who I am. But those are not the only things that are mine -- there is a far vaster non-material realm which describes what is mine .
How I look, think, feel, smell, portray myself to others and act are all essential parts to defining me. My culture, my history, my education, and my experiences are uniquely my own as well. So this is the question: how to mine and me fit together? Mine is that which belongs to me. Granted. But mine is also that which defines me. More importantly, mine is that which defines my perception of myself -- both the material and non-material aspects.
How different would I be if I didn't own the clothes, furniture, accessories, passport, diploma, and car that I do? Who would I be if I thought, felt, smelled, portrayed myself, and acted differently? What would be left of me if I was stripped of my culture, my history, my education, and my experiences? Obviously these are rhetorical questions, as I do not believe it is entirely possible to do. But it does make me want to put my life in perspective and think about what would need to be taken away from me, or be different, in order for me not to feel like myself anymore.
I have been without material possessions. My house burned down when I lived in South Africa and I was left with nothing but the clothes I had on. But I didn't feel less than myself for it. In fact, I can recall few instances where I felt more alive.
I have experienced changes in attitudes, beliefs, and physical characteristics. My butt didn't always use to be this big, and I don't still want to join GreenPeace.
I have experienced a significant loss of my original culture and a syncretism with North American culture, I suppose, since moving here four years ago. And my education and my experiences have been significantly increasing since the day I was born.
So it's a hard question to answer.
But what better way to spend ones time than to attempt to express ones sense of self rationally?
Monday, November 14, 2005
The Story of Phillip
Right now I am working on processing a manuscript collection of a historic African American funeral home in Charleston. I am going through all their records – ledgers, invoices, and documentation pertaining to the dead. A lot of the information is standard – name of deceased, address, date of death, place of burial… but some records contain a lot more information. Some records relate information about the occupation of the deceased, whether they were veterans of a war, what they died of, and the details of their funeral arrangements – how many cars were going to the funeral and whether they bought flowers.
While I go through the records, I make up stories of what their lives were like. I take all the information provided in those yellowed pages and make up a story – I try to give life to these dead pages through my imagination because I don’t think I could bear to work with these records otherwise. I look at these records, brittle and frail, and it strikes me so hard that all of these people, summarized on a single sheet of paper, are now gone forever.
If it wasn’t for these records, I would never know of their existence. Take Phillip Robert Russell, who died on June 6, 1952 at 3:35 pm. He drowned. He was a sailor for the US Navy, 23 years old. His mother’s name was Martha, his dad’s was Harry. The Navy paid for his funeral, a total of $47.95. His remains were shipped to Boston, and the only personal service done to him was putting an engraved name plate on his casket, for a total of $2.00. There were no death notices in the papers and no money was spent on flowers. These are the cold, hard facts relating to Phillip. But who was he aside from that?
In my mind, he was a vigorous, intelligent, handsome man who joined the Navy to see the world and make his mother proud. He was proud to be who he was but being that he was black, he was faced with constant discrimination. He wouldn’t back down when insulted though, and his courage made his fellow sailors afraid, because they couldn’t break him. So one day they ganged up on him and threw him overboard, because they knew he couldn’t swim. That’s what happened in my mind. But reality was surely different.
I’m sure few if any people today remember that Phillip died here. His parents are surely dead, and his siblings, if he had any, are probably in their 80s. I look at this record and there is so much about him that I want to know.
Does anybody visit his grave in Boston anymore? Does anybody know what he liked to do on his time off or the reason why he joined the navy?
The only reason anyone in fifty years will probably know of Phillip’s existence is if they come across this dusty bound ledger with frayed pages and fading ink. I guess that’s why I do what I do. When there will be nobody remaining in this world who can tell me what this young sailor looked like when he smiled, I can at least make sure that people have a miniscule record of his life, so they can, if nothing else, make up a story of what his life was like.
While I go through the records, I make up stories of what their lives were like. I take all the information provided in those yellowed pages and make up a story – I try to give life to these dead pages through my imagination because I don’t think I could bear to work with these records otherwise. I look at these records, brittle and frail, and it strikes me so hard that all of these people, summarized on a single sheet of paper, are now gone forever.
If it wasn’t for these records, I would never know of their existence. Take Phillip Robert Russell, who died on June 6, 1952 at 3:35 pm. He drowned. He was a sailor for the US Navy, 23 years old. His mother’s name was Martha, his dad’s was Harry. The Navy paid for his funeral, a total of $47.95. His remains were shipped to Boston, and the only personal service done to him was putting an engraved name plate on his casket, for a total of $2.00. There were no death notices in the papers and no money was spent on flowers. These are the cold, hard facts relating to Phillip. But who was he aside from that?
In my mind, he was a vigorous, intelligent, handsome man who joined the Navy to see the world and make his mother proud. He was proud to be who he was but being that he was black, he was faced with constant discrimination. He wouldn’t back down when insulted though, and his courage made his fellow sailors afraid, because they couldn’t break him. So one day they ganged up on him and threw him overboard, because they knew he couldn’t swim. That’s what happened in my mind. But reality was surely different.
I’m sure few if any people today remember that Phillip died here. His parents are surely dead, and his siblings, if he had any, are probably in their 80s. I look at this record and there is so much about him that I want to know.
Does anybody visit his grave in Boston anymore? Does anybody know what he liked to do on his time off or the reason why he joined the navy?
The only reason anyone in fifty years will probably know of Phillip’s existence is if they come across this dusty bound ledger with frayed pages and fading ink. I guess that’s why I do what I do. When there will be nobody remaining in this world who can tell me what this young sailor looked like when he smiled, I can at least make sure that people have a miniscule record of his life, so they can, if nothing else, make up a story of what his life was like.
Piccola Stella Senza Cielo
by Ligabue
Ti bruceraiPiccola stella senza cielo.
Ti mostrerai
Ci incanteremo mentre scoppi in volo
Ti scioglierai
Dietro a una scia un soffio, un velo
Ti staccherai
Perchè ti tiene su soltanto un filo, sai.
You will burn,
tiny star without a sky.
You will show yourself to us,
We'll feel enchanted as you explode in flight.
You will melt
Behind a wake, a breath, a veil
You will detach
Because you are held up only by a string, you know.
These lyrics are part of a song by an Italian artist. It's sometimes easier for me to connect to Italian songs than English ones-- more poetic, I suppose. The lyrics are actually far more multi-faceted than my poor translation expresses, trust me.
Friday, November 11, 2005
Where in the World...
I was intrigued by my dear friend Mimi's latest post... if you could go to five places in the world in five days (or more), where would you go? Alas, I am not going to give you just that, but I'm going to add a twist too!
Scandalous, you say?!
I'm going to add a "with whom" part to the "where."
Scandalous, I know.
1. Macchu Picchu, Peru -- with my mother
2. Vietnam -- with my roomates and Siobhan
3. Mt. Fuji -- with Lauren
4. New Zealand -- by myself
5. the North Pole -- with my significant other (for warmth purposes, of course!), and everyone I care about! (That would make it a pretty big trip, but I bet it could get pretty lonely out there.)
Scandalous, you say?!
I'm going to add a "with whom" part to the "where."
Scandalous, I know.
1. Macchu Picchu, Peru -- with my mother
2. Vietnam -- with my roomates and Siobhan
3. Mt. Fuji -- with Lauren
4. New Zealand -- by myself
5. the North Pole -- with my significant other (for warmth purposes, of course!), and everyone I care about! (That would make it a pretty big trip, but I bet it could get pretty lonely out there.)
Thursday, November 10, 2005
There's a feeling I get when I look to the west...
Our shadows taller than our souls
There walks a lady we all know
Who shines white light and wants to show
How everything still turns to gold
And if you listen very hard
The tune will come to you at last
When all are one and one is all
To be a rock and not to roll...
-- Led Zepplin, Stairway to Heaven
Wednesday, November 09, 2005
Troubadour
Yesterday, I was walking down King Street with Carter when a street musician came up to us. He asked Carter if he would "buy the lovely lady a song," and Carter agreed. He started playing the harmonica -- some blues and some boogie -- for us. He was a black man in his sixties perhaps (hard to tell), tall and slender, and a man who had been through rough times. But he didn't beg for money... he offered us a service (musical entertainment) for a monetary compensation. We were enjoying the performance (because he was really extraordinarily good) when a group of young, preppy white kids step out of a restaurant. They see Carter and I standing there, and the musician playing for us. One of the kids, wearing a striped green shirt and a baseball cap turned backwards starts laughing and says, "Aww, man, now you gotta do a little dance to that, too!" Then he walks away, laughing with his friends. I stood there for a moment, startled. I couldn't believe what had just happened.
One second, we were enjoying an interchange -- he performed music for us, we paid him -- the next, he is being demeaned, publicly - by a pimply guy whose only skills are probably limited to getting a highscore in Halo. How did he had the nerve, the audacity, the presumtion that he could speak like that to a man who was trying as best he could to eek out an honest living? Who was he to tell this man to "do a little dance with that?" Would he have instructed any man with a harmonica to dance? What if that were Bob Dylan? Or the white twenty-something guy who pretends to be John Mayer who plays at Red's on Friday? (Red's is a bar in the up-scale part of town known as Mt. Pleasant) Would he have laughed and pointed then? Chances are, he never thought he was even doing anything wrong. He never thought how goddamn condescending, elitist, and insulting he was being. He probably just thought he was being funny. Truth is, he was ascribing to a century old belief system in which he sees his white, upper class self as superior, and he was, through his comments, showing that he did not respect this individual as a full human being.
This musicial had talent, and without knowing how or why, some guy a third of his age judged him and decided that he was better than him, by publicly demeaning him. Am I exaggerating? Am I going over the top and making a big hoopla out of an innocent remark? I don't think I am. What could this man have been if people had given him a chance? Maybe he would have been on the streets anyway. But he was talented, polite, and educated. As we walked away, he said to me, "I'm a troubadour -- a representative of the lost art." Did the pimply-faced kid who walked away feeling good about himself even know what the word "troubadour" meant?
The questions are rhetorical. The point is that the kid should have been taught respect for his fellow human beings. I don't for one second believe that everyone deserves the same kind of respect -- I for one don't respect that kid on an intellectual level because of his actions and if I ever see him again I will tell him as much -- but I have a basic level of respect for everyone. That is what he lacked. That is, unfortunately, what a lot of people lack.
One second, we were enjoying an interchange -- he performed music for us, we paid him -- the next, he is being demeaned, publicly - by a pimply guy whose only skills are probably limited to getting a highscore in Halo. How did he had the nerve, the audacity, the presumtion that he could speak like that to a man who was trying as best he could to eek out an honest living? Who was he to tell this man to "do a little dance with that?" Would he have instructed any man with a harmonica to dance? What if that were Bob Dylan? Or the white twenty-something guy who pretends to be John Mayer who plays at Red's on Friday? (Red's is a bar in the up-scale part of town known as Mt. Pleasant) Would he have laughed and pointed then? Chances are, he never thought he was even doing anything wrong. He never thought how goddamn condescending, elitist, and insulting he was being. He probably just thought he was being funny. Truth is, he was ascribing to a century old belief system in which he sees his white, upper class self as superior, and he was, through his comments, showing that he did not respect this individual as a full human being.
This musicial had talent, and without knowing how or why, some guy a third of his age judged him and decided that he was better than him, by publicly demeaning him. Am I exaggerating? Am I going over the top and making a big hoopla out of an innocent remark? I don't think I am. What could this man have been if people had given him a chance? Maybe he would have been on the streets anyway. But he was talented, polite, and educated. As we walked away, he said to me, "I'm a troubadour -- a representative of the lost art." Did the pimply-faced kid who walked away feeling good about himself even know what the word "troubadour" meant?
The questions are rhetorical. The point is that the kid should have been taught respect for his fellow human beings. I don't for one second believe that everyone deserves the same kind of respect -- I for one don't respect that kid on an intellectual level because of his actions and if I ever see him again I will tell him as much -- but I have a basic level of respect for everyone. That is what he lacked. That is, unfortunately, what a lot of people lack.
Tuesday, November 08, 2005
Friend or Fluke?
I was having dinner at a Chinese restaurant with my friend M. a few days ago, and after the usual chatter about work and people we knew, our conversation turned towards many girls' favorite topic: guys. She was expressing her frustration about her inability to find a good guy. She's smart, fun, good-looking... and why doesn't a guy out there notice? Usually, I would have been the first person to jump on that bandwagon and ramble on about how guys are retards and can't tell a whore from a princess and are intimidated by intelligence and don't understand the first thing about seeing a woman for who she is. And I tried to tell her all this, because I do believe it's true, but I couldn't get myself to mumble more than a few half-hearted phrases amidst bites of fried rice. I wanted to tell her these things to make her feel better, because I knew she wanted to hear me say them... after all, that is what she had always heard me say... but I felt like such a fluke. Here I was, the exception to the rule -- the girl who did have a great guy. Who was I to attack men? I felt like a traitor to womanhood, and for a brief moment I wanted to give up Carter, simply for the sake of camaraderie. For so long, my role has been supporting female friends by expressing how I was in their same boat. Now, I felt like I was that annoying girlfriend who patted you on the back and said, "don't worry, you'll find a great guy too someday." The same one who "feels for you" and gives you the sympathetic look and tells you that "he's out there." How I cringe at the thought of becoming her! I can't be her! But how can I be a loyal, honest friend to the girls who mean the world to me without being a condescending "I-feel-for-you" motherfigure?
Thursday, November 03, 2005
The Reversal of "Job"
Can it be true? Ethel said "good things happen too, you know." I think I'm still in shock. I know I am. For the first time in forever, I feel like I've been swept clean off my feet.
His name is Carter.
His name is Carter.
Wednesday, November 02, 2005
Absolutely Impossible
I went to see a play yesterday about Hermann Goering, Hitler's second in command. It was fascinating, to say the least... especially coupling that with an autobiography I'm reading right now by Hitler's secretary. It was unlike many plays I've seen because it didn't have a clear message -- it didn't try to say that Goering was an evil man, though he certainly perpetrated evil acts. It didn't try to say that Goering was a good man, though he certainly had a way of charming the people you'd least expect -- like his Jewish psychiatrist. The message it sent, the message I understood - is something I've been thinking about for a long time. It is not only ignorant, but actually harmful for people to oversimplify individuals' characters as wholly "good" or "evil." Not only are the terms subjective, they are also completely impossible descriptors. Yes, Hitler, Goering, and his entire posse committed or sanctioned atrocities beyond my imagination. But each of these "evil" men had a family, a hobby, a sensitivity that any human can connect to. Hitler had a pet dog that he trained and loved; Goering, who showed no signs of regret for his actions, broke down in tears like a baby after his wife visited him in prison. It is so often preferable to ignore these endearing traits and to dehumanize them on a surface level. But this overly simplified analysis of them-- be it Goering, Hitler, Stalin, Franco, Mussolini, Kim Jung Il, Mbutu, Castro, Saddam, whomever -- is dangerous. It strips away our ability to understand that the capability for evil is within all of us. It creates a dualistic world in which "we" are always good and "they" are always bad. And one in which "we" could never be "them". But if you look at the actions of the world, the events of history, it is so easy for the tables to be turned. If Germany had won the war, it would be Franklin Roosevelt who would be vilified for allowing the Japanese interment camps, the atomic bombings and resulting death of undetermined numbers of people at Nagasaki and Hiroshima. It would be Churchill who would be condemned for indiscriminately bombing civilians in the city of Dresden, after German surrender. There are enough evil acts to go around. But I doubt anyone would go so far as to claim the Roosevelt or Churchill are evil. In fact, they are known as the champions of democracy. So it is true, the winners write the history books, and everyone is more complex than they seem. There are no justifications for the wrongs committed in history, and I am not one to believe that we cannot pass judgment on actions. We do, and we must, so that we can attempt to achieve progress. But we must do that while remaining cognizant of the fact that all humans are complex, no one is simply "evil," or simply "good," and that by labeling people as such we are doing a disservice to our understanding of humanity.
Tuesday, November 01, 2005
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)